
The sale of LaSalle was frozen by the Commercial Court in MayABN Amro's $21bn (£11.5bn) sale of its LaSalle unit to Bank of America was lawful, the Dutch Supreme Court says.
Some shareholders had tried to have the sale stopped on the grounds that ABN had not sought their approval first.
The ruling is good news for Barclays Bank, which made an offer for ABN dependent on LaSalle being sold.
Meanwhile a consortium led by RBS said it would go ahead with a revised offer for ABN Amro "on materially superior terms to Barclays' proposed offer".
RBS also said its new offer would "ot be conditional upon LaSalle remaining part of the ABN AMRO group".
Some ABN shareholders had been claiming to the court that the LaSalle sale was intended to block an offer from the RBS-led consortium, which also includes Santander and Fortis.
'No obligation'
Shares in ABN Amro, Barclays and RBS, the three main protagonists in Europe's largest banking tussle, all rose after the ruling was announced.
Analysts said this reflected the fact that although the judgment was positive for Barclays, it was by no means certain that it would prevail in the bid battle.
ABN has backed Barclays' 62.8bn euro ($85.3bn; £42.5bn) offer.
But Dutch group VEB, which represents small shareholders in ABN, argued LaSalle's planned sale to Bank of America effective
ly blocked a higher 71bn-euro bid from RBS and its partners, Spain's Santander and Belgium's Fortis, as their offer hinges on LaSalle not being sold.
The Dutch Commercial Court initially ruled in favour of the shareholders' group, preventing the LaSalle transaction.
The ruling boosts Barclays boss John Varley in the battle for ABN
But the advocate general, in his advice to the Supreme Court last month, disagreed and the Supreme Court upheld his view.
"The fact that the shareholders aim at selling their shares at the highest possible price involves no obligation for the board of directors of ABN Amro to obtain the shareholders' approval for the sale of LaSalle," the ruling stated.
"There should not be any unnecessary uncertainty about the carrying out of this agreement, into which the directors of ABN Amro were entitled to enter," it added.
'One battle'
Bank of America said it was "satisfied" with the ruling and would now look to complete the deal as soon as possible.
Far from admitting defeat, VEB said it believed it would ultimately succeed in forcing ABN Amro to consider the two bids on their financial merits.
"They may have won this battle but they will lose the war," said its director Peter Paul de Vries.
"I don't think the Barclays bid will be interesting for many shareholders because it is billions of euros lower than the alternative."
Analysts believe the RBS consortium could return with a fresh offer for ABN Amro, excluding the LaSalle business.
Whichever of Barclays or the RBS consortium eventually wins control of ABN, the deal will create one of the world's largest banking groups.
Some shareholders had tried to have the sale stopped on the grounds that ABN had not sought their approval first.
The ruling is good news for Barclays Bank, which made an offer for ABN dependent on LaSalle being sold.
Meanwhile a consortium led by RBS said it would go ahead with a revised offer for ABN Amro "on materially superior terms to Barclays' proposed offer".
RBS also said its new offer would "ot be conditional upon LaSalle remaining part of the ABN AMRO group".
Some ABN shareholders had been claiming to the court that the LaSalle sale was intended to block an offer from the RBS-led consortium, which also includes Santander and Fortis.
'No obligation'
Shares in ABN Amro, Barclays and RBS, the three main protagonists in Europe's largest banking tussle, all rose after the ruling was announced.
Analysts said this reflected the fact that although the judgment was positive for Barclays, it was by no means certain that it would prevail in the bid battle.
ABN has backed Barclays' 62.8bn euro ($85.3bn; £42.5bn) offer.
But Dutch group VEB, which represents small shareholders in ABN, argued LaSalle's planned sale to Bank of America effective
ly blocked a higher 71bn-euro bid from RBS and its partners, Spain's Santander and Belgium's Fortis, as their offer hinges on LaSalle not being sold.The Dutch Commercial Court initially ruled in favour of the shareholders' group, preventing the LaSalle transaction.
The ruling boosts Barclays boss John Varley in the battle for ABN
But the advocate general, in his advice to the Supreme Court last month, disagreed and the Supreme Court upheld his view.
"The fact that the shareholders aim at selling their shares at the highest possible price involves no obligation for the board of directors of ABN Amro to obtain the shareholders' approval for the sale of LaSalle," the ruling stated.
"There should not be any unnecessary uncertainty about the carrying out of this agreement, into which the directors of ABN Amro were entitled to enter," it added.
'One battle'
Bank of America said it was "satisfied" with the ruling and would now look to complete the deal as soon as possible.
Far from admitting defeat, VEB said it believed it would ultimately succeed in forcing ABN Amro to consider the two bids on their financial merits.
"They may have won this battle but they will lose the war," said its director Peter Paul de Vries.
"I don't think the Barclays bid will be interesting for many shareholders because it is billions of euros lower than the alternative."
Analysts believe the RBS consortium could return with a fresh offer for ABN Amro, excluding the LaSalle business.
Whichever of Barclays or the RBS consortium eventually wins control of ABN, the deal will create one of the world's largest banking groups.

Wall Street soared Thursday, propelling the Standard & Poor's 500 index and Dow Jones industrials into record territory as bright spots among generally sluggish retail sales allowed investors to toss aside concerns about the health of the economy.A new bid for aluminum maker Alcan Inc. added to the upbeat mood of the session, which saw stocks put up their biggest gains of the year. The rise marked a sharp contrast to the start of the week, when stocks fell sharply amid concerns that some hedge funds could buckle under ill-placed bets on the housing sector.Though retail sales generally appeared to be crimped last month by higher gasoline prices and a tepid housing market, and the outlook for the coming months was difficult to ascertain, the overall reading wasn't as dour as some investors expected. Several reports beat Street expectations notably that of Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world's largest retailer, which posted a better-than-expected 2.4 percent jump in sales at stores open at least a year."It's relief that things weren't as bad as people expected," said Bill Schultz, chief investment officer at McQueen, Ball & Associates, referring to the retailers' reports and the economy at large. "We're maybe getting slower growth but not the fall-of-the-cliff economic scenarios," he said of investors' reading of the economy.But, Schultz said, "I think it is, over the near-term, a little bit over done, certainly on a two-day basis," he added, referring to the rally.In late afternoon trading, the S&P 500 rose 21.96, or 1.45 percent, to 1,540.72, above its record close of 1,539.18, set June 4. The Dow rose 232.73, or 1.71 percent, to 13,810.60; its record close is 13,676.32, also set June 4.The Nasdaq composite index rose 39.53, or 1.49 percent, to 2,691.32.The report from Wal-Mart, one of the 30 companies that make up the Dow, helped ease some investors' worries about the health of the consumer ahead of the Commerce Department's Friday report on U.S. retail sales.



